Long gone are the days when the man in your life could present you with a special dress at the last minute for a surprise night out with the knowledge that it would fit perfectly. Her size would be more like a size 6 by today's standards.
However, this proved unsuccessful because women's bodies have far more variety in shape. A woman with an hourglass figure and a woman with an apple-shaped figure who have the same bust size will not have the same waist or hip sizes.
This was a significant problem for mail-order companies, and several attempts at predictable, standard sizing were made Felsenthal In the s, the statisticians Ruth O'Brien and William Shelton received a Works Progress Administration grant to conduct the most ambitious effort to solve this problem.
Their team measured almost 15, women across the US. After discovering the complex diversity of women's actual sizes, which produced five to seven different body shapes, they proposed a three-part sizing system. Each size would be the combination of a single number, representing an upper body measurement, plus an indicator for height short, regular, and long and an indication for girth slim, regular, and stout.
The various combinations of height and girth resulted in nine different sizes for each numerical upper-body measurement, which was highly impractical for manufacturing Felsenthal As a result, O'Brien and Shelton's work was rejected. In , the National Bureau of Standards invented a new sizing system, based on the hourglass figure and using only the bust size to create an arbitrary standard of sizes ranging from 8 to 38, with an indication for height short, regular, and tall and lower-body girth plus or minus.
The resulting commercial standard was not widely popular, and was declared voluntary in and withdrawn entirely in It has not been widely adopted. Women's sizes are divided into various types, depending on height. These charts give an indication of size only and are by no means exact as they vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, sometimes by a full inch up and down.
At that time, they were very similar to British dress sizes. However, due to vanity sizing, the current US dress sizes have little or no meaning. In fact, these arbitrary numbers only serve as a general guideline. Long gone are the days when the man in your life could present you with a special dress at the last minute for a surprise night out with the knowledge that it would fit perfectly.
Today's woman must spend hours in the dressing room to achieve the same effect. At the current time we have little evidence as to how widespread the use of any of the aforementioned sizes is, therefore they only get this brief mention.
Part of the reason for shrinking sizes is that women feel increasing pressure to be smaller. Movies, television, and magazines continue to set the standard for female beauty, and that standard is unachievably tiny for most women. You can buy some tapes from most retail stores and they measure your waist size in inches.
Waist measurement of size 8 in women? That varies according to which country you are in. What size is your waist if you wear a 18 in womens? Mine is 39 inches. Waist measurement for a size 8? What is a womans dress size with 26inch waist? In the UK a women with a 26inch waist is a size 8!.. What dress size for 26 inch waist?
US Dress Size History. In the s and s, standard US dress sizes were formulated from statistical data. At that time, they were very similar to British dress sizes. However, due to vanity sizing, the current US dress sizes have little or no meaning. In fact, these arbitrary numbers only serve as . Women’s size guide – US sizes Use the chart below to find out women’s clothing sizes in US sizes for dresses, jackets and coats. To find the correct size, first take your bust, hip and waist measurements, either in inches or in centimeters. Like misses' sizes, the sizes may be given as a dress size based on the bust measurement, but they are usually given as even-numbered sizes from 18 up. Categorical sizes usually range from 1X (similar to extra-large, but with slightly different proportions compared to the misses' size) up.